Designing Serious Games for Libraries: Aligning Educational and Persuasive Intent for Anxiety Mitigation and Heritage Engagement

Ivan Kratchanov; Detelin Luchev

doi:10.55630/dipp.2026.16.9

Authors

Ivan Kratchanov Institute of Mathematics and Informatics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 8 Acad. Georgi Bonchev Street, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria , Ivan Vazov National Library, 17 Avksentii Veleshki Street, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Detelin Luchev Institute of Mathematics and Informatics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 8 Acad. Georgi Bonchev Street, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55630/dipp.2026.16.9

Keywords:

Serious Games, Library Anxiety, Cultural Heritage, Persuasive Design, Pedagogical Alignment, Gamification Ethics

Abstract

Libraries occupy a unique niche within the GLAM sector, yet users often face emotional barriers that hinder engagement. This article explores the integration of three design frameworks: the Four-Dimensional Framework, Learning Mechanics–Game Mechanics, and Persuasive Systems Design, to create serious games for libraries. By aligning pedagogical goals with specific game mechanics and persuasive strategies, the authors argue for a hybrid design approach that prioritizes learner autonomy and emotional safety. The study emphasizes that ethical, non-punitive design is essential for maintaining institutional trust and transforming intimidated visitors into confident, capable library participants.

References

Arnab, S., Lim, T., Carvalho, M. B., Bellotti, F., de Freitas, S., Louchart, S., Suttie, N., Berta, R., & De Gloria, A. (2015). Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12113

Barclay, D. A. (2017). Space and the social worth of public libraries. Public Library Quarterly, 36(4), 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2017.1327767

Berdichevsky, D., & Neuenschwander, E. (1999). Toward an ethics of persuasive technology. Communications of the ACM, 42(5), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/301353.301410

Bogost, I. (2007). Persuasive games: The expressive power of videogames. MIT Press.

Bostick, S. L. (1992). The development and validation of the Library Anxiety Scale (Publication No. 9310624) [Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/openview/9682f484578028491b665fa74180583f/1

Carlile, H. (2007). The implications of library anxiety for academic reference services: A review of literature. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 38(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2007.10721282

de Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2006). How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated? Computers & Education, 46(3), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.007

Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137

Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9–15). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040

Fogg, B. J. (1998). Persuasive computers: Perspectives and research directions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’98) (pp. 225–232). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. https://doi.org/10.1145/274644.274677

Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufmann.

Fogg, B. J. (2009). A behavior model for persuasive design. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (Persuasive '09) (Article 40, pp. 1–7). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1541948.1541999

Gagné, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Hahn, J. (2012). Mobile augmented reality applications for library services. New Library World, 113(9–10), 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074801211273902

Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work?—A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3025–3034). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377

Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & Education, 80, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019

Khan, I., Melro, A., Amaro, A. C., & Oliveira, L. (2022). Role of gamification in cultural heritage dissemination: A systematic review. In X. S. Yang, S. Sherratt, N. Dey, & A. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Vol. 235, pp. 393–400). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2377-6_37

Kratchanov, I. (2025). Towards a hybrid educational-persuasive framework for a library-oriented serious game to alleviate library anxiety. Digital Presentation and Preservation of Cultural and Scientific Heritage, 15, 177–186. https://doi.org/10.55630/dipp.2025.15.16

Mellon, C. A. (1986). Library anxiety: A grounded theory and its development. College & Research Libraries術, 47(2), 160–165. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_47_02_160

Mortara, M., Catalano, C. E., Bellotti, F., Fiucci, G., Houry-Panchetti, M., & Petridis, P. (2014). Learning cultural heritage by serious games. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 15(3), 318–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2013.04.004

Oinas-Kukkonen, H., & Harjumaa, M. (2008). A systematic framework for designing and evaluating persuasive systems. In H. Oinas-Kukkonen, P. Hasle, M. Harjumaa, K. Segerståhl, & P. Øhrstrøm (Eds.), Persuasive Technology (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5033, pp. 164–176). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68504-3_15

Oinas-Kukkonen, H., & Harjumaa, M. (2009). Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24(1), 485–500. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.02428

Proulx, J.-N., Romero, M., & Arnab, S. (2017). Learning mechanics and game mechanics under the perspective of self-determination theory to foster motivation in digital game-based learning. Simulation & Gaming, 48(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878116674399

Reed, K. N., & Miller, A. (2020). Applying gamification to the library orientation: A study of interactive user experience and engagement preferences. Information Technology and Libraries, 39(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v39i3.12209

Reeve, J. (2006). Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. The Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1086/501484

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Sicart, M. (2009). The ethics of computer games. MIT Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Walsh, A. (2014). The potential for using gamification in academic libraries in order to increase student engagement and achievement. Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education, 6(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.15845/noril.v6i1.214