Supporting Sustainable Interventions in the Historical Center of Lugoj City, Romania, Through Life-Cycle Assessment Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55630/dipp.2026.16.24Keywords:
Life-cycle Assessment, Restoration, Sustainable Intervention, LCA Framework, Heritage PreservationAbstract
This study aims to integrate Life-Cycle Assessment into the heritage conservation framework for Lugoj’s historical center. Typological strategies compare minimal repairs to retrofits for masonry structures, prioritizing life extensions and low-impact interventions. The results favor low-impact interventions that extend service life.References
Angrisano, M., Fabbrocino, F., Iodice, P., & Girard, L. F. (2021). The evaluation of historic building energy retrofit projects through the life cycle assessment. Applied Sciences, 11(15), Article 7145. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11157145
Azap, B., Apostol, I., Mosoarca, M., Chieffo, N., & Formisano, A. (2018). Seismic vulnerability scenarios for historical areas of Timisoara. In S. Nistor & G. A. Popoviciu (Eds.), 17th International Technical-Scientific Conference Modern Technologies for the 3rd Millennium March 22-23, 2018 - Oradea (Romania) (pp. 149–154). Editografica. https://cloud.uoradea.ro/index.php/s/swTp3We9kfKSzBn
Bureșin, C. A. (2023). Redarea identității pierdute prin restaurare și interconnectare vizuală [Restoring lost identity through restoration and visual interconnection] (Bachelor's thesis). Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Politehnica University of Timișoara.
Draghici, C., & Onescu, I. (2025). The harmonious relationship between public space and surrounding buildings in the historical city of Lugoj, Romania. In Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Civil Engineering and Architecture ICCEA 2025. Springer.
Draghici, C., Onescu, I., Tanase, I., & Povian, C. (2025). Towards a more cohesive and accessible city centre: Bridging the gap between historical identity and modern community’s needs—Case study: Lugoj city, Romania. Heritage.
Elnaggar, A. (2024). Nine principles of green heritage science: life cycle assessment as a tool enabling green transformation. Heritage Science, 12, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-01114-z
Fahlstedt, O., Rasmussen, F. N., Temeljotov-Salaj, A., Huang, L., & Bohne, R. A. (2024). Building renovations and life cycle assessment - A scoping literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 203, Article 114774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114774
Huang, Z., Zhou, H., Miao, Z., Tang, H., Lin, B., & Zhuang, W. (2024). Life-cycle carbon emissions (LCCE) of buildings: Implications, calculations, and reductions. Engineering, 31, 115–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2023.08.019
Mazzetto, S. (2025). Comparative life cycle assessment of traditional and modern materials in heritage building restoration: A case study from Ushaiger Village. Sustainability, 17(1), Article 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010025
Mosiu, A., Ion, R.-M., Onescu, I. M.-L., Bunget, O.-C., Iancu, L., Grigorescu, R. M., & Ion, N. (2025). Architectural heritage conservation and green restoration with hydroxyapatite sustainable eco-materials. Sustainability, 17(13), Article 5788. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135788
Municipality of Lugoj. (2026, March 5). Istoric Lugoj. Retrieved March 5, 2026, from https://www.primarialugoj.ro/Continut_site/Despre_Lugoj/Istoric/istorie_Lugoj.html
Neikova, M. (2024, September 5). Digitalization and protection of cultural heritage by establishing a sustainable legal framework. Digital Presentation and Preservation of Cultural and Scientific Heritage, 14, 197–204. https://dipp.math.bas.bg/dipp/article/view/dipp.2024.14.18
Peteva, I., Pavlova, D., Pavlova, I., & Gindev, P. (2024). Digitization and protection of cultural heritage in crises and conflicts. Digital Presentation and Preservation of Cultural and Scientific Heritage, 14, 249–256. https://doi.org/10.55630/dipp.2024.14.23
Rubio-Aguinaga, A., Kyriakou, L., Fernández, J. M., Navarro-Blasco, I., Pavia, S., & Álvarez, J. I. (2025). Sustainability of PCM-lime mortars for heritage retrofitting: Carbon footprint and impact on energy demand across climates. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 23, Article e05294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e05294
Wise, F., Moncaster, A., & Jones, D. (2023). Embodied carbon and building retrofit: A heritage example. In R. Azari & A. Moncaster (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Carbon in the Built Environment (pp. 296–328). Routledge.
Zhang, Y., Sattar, S., Cook, D., & Johnson, K. (2024). Systematic review of embodied carbon assessment and reduction in building life cycles. National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1324
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Digital Presentation and Preservation of Cultural and Scientific Heritage

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
