Enhancing Scientific Heritage Access Through AI-Powered Assistants and Collaboration Platforms in Academic Ecosystems

Authors

  • Evgeniya Georgieva University of Ruse Angel Kanchev, 8 Studentska Street, 7017 Ruse, Bulgaria
  • Tsvetozar Georgiev University of Ruse Angel Kanchev, 8 Studentska Street, 7017 Ruse, Bulgaria
  • Tsvetelina Stefanova University of Ruse Angel Kanchev, 8 Studentska Street, 7017 Ruse, Bulgaria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55630/dipp.2026.16.16

Keywords:

Digital Scientific Heritage, Artificial Intelligence, AI-Powered Research Assistants, Academic Ecosystems, Knowledge Graphs, Decentralized Science

Abstract

This study investigates how artificial intelligence and collaboration platforms enhance scientific heritage access within academic ecosystems. Within the context of evolving infrastructures for scientific discovery and heritage preservation, the analysis examines advanced digitization methods, semantic networks, autonomous research agents, and mainstream database AI integrations. Findings indicate that while these technologies democratize knowledge, institutions must proactively address inherent ethical, legal, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities.

References

AAAI. (2025). AAAI-26 review process update: Scale, integrity measures, and pathways to sustainability. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. https://aaai.org/conference/aaai/aaai-26/review-process-update/

Blaszczyk, M., McGovern, G., & Stanley, K. D. (2024). Artificial intelligence impacts on copyright law. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA3243-1.html

Brennan, S. (2025). BioAgents: Accelerating decentralized science with AI agents. Bio.xyz. https://www.bio.xyz/blog-posts/bioagents-pioneering-decentralized-science-with-ai-agents

Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. (2024). Reference model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS) (CCSDS 650.0-M-3). https://ccsds.org/Pubs/650x0m3.pdf

Covidence. (2026). See your systematic reviews like never before. https://www.covidence.org/

EBSCO. (2026). AI insights. https://connect.ebsco.com/s/article/Generative-AI-Insights-Beta-Summaries?language=en_US

Ellucian. (2026). Artificial intelligence in higher education: From widespread adoption to strategic integration. https://lp.ellucian.com/rs/085-MHT-312/images/Ellucian_2026-AI-Report.pdf

Elsevier. (2026a). Generative AI policies for journals. https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies-and-standards/generative-ai-policies-for-journals

Elsevier. (2026b). LeapSpace: Move from curiosity to discovery, faster. https://www.elsevier.com/products/leapspace

Felicetti, A., Himmiche, A., & Somenzi, M. (2025). Knowledge graphs and artificial intelligence for the implementation of cognitive heritage digital twins. Applied Sciences, 15(18), 10061. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810061

Georgieva, E., & Georgiev, T. (2025). How artificial intelligence can transform services in research libraries. In C. Kahraman et al. (Eds.), Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems. INFUS 2025 (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Vol. 1530). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-98565-2_76

Gottweis, J., & Natarajan, V. (2025). Accelerating scientific breakthroughs with an AI co-scientist. Google Research. https://research.google/blog/accelerating-scientific-breakthroughs-with-an-ai-co-scientist/

Grimmett, J. (2026). AI may be making us think and write more alike. USC Dornsife. https://dornsife.usc.edu/news/stories/ai-may-be-making-us-think-and-write-more-alike/

Heer, J., Conlen, M., Devireddy, V., Nguyen, T., & Horowitz, J. (2023). Living papers: A language toolkit for augmented scholarly communication. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Article 42, pp. 1–13). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3586183.3606791

International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP). (2024). The EU AI copyright playbook: The TDM exception and AI Act's transparency requirements. https://iapp.org/news/a/the-eu-ai-copyright-playbook-the-tdm-exception-and-ai-act-s-transparency-requirements

JSTOR. (2025). JSTOR's AI research tool: Overview. https://support.jstor.org/hc/en-us/articles/25755478251159-JSTOR-s-AI-Research-Tool-Overview

Jain, S. J., Sibbu, K., & Kuri, R. (2023). Conducting effective research using SciSpace: A practical approach. Authorea. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.170111059.99508682/v1

Kim, J. S. (2025). Academic library with generative AI: From passive information providers to proactive knowledge facilitators. Publications, 13(3), 37. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/13/3/37

Lian, Y., & Xie, J. (2024). The evolution of digital cultural heritage research: Identifying key trends, hotspots, and challenges through bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 16(16), 7125. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167125

Matz, M. (2026). AI “adviser” accelerates robotic design of advanced electronic materials. Argonne National Laboratory. https://www.anl.gov/article/ai-adviser-accelerates-robotic-design-of-advanced-electronic-materials

Molecule. (2026). Molecule protocol home | A new era of drug development. https://www.molecule.to/

Nockels, J., Gooding, P., Ames, S., & Terras, M. (2022). Understanding the application of handwritten text recognition technology in heritage contexts: A systematic review of Transkribus in published research. Archival Science, 22(3), 367–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-022-09397-0

OriginTrail. (2026). Decentralized knowledge graph: The core of verifiable Internet for AI. https://origintrail.io/technology/decentralized-knowledge-graph

OWASP Foundation. (2025). OWASP top 10 for Large Language Model applications. Open Worldwide Application Security Project (OWASP). https://genai.owasp.org/llm-top-10/

Schmidgall, S., & Moor, M. (2025). AgentRxiv: Towards collaborative autonomous research. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.18102

Scopus. (2026). Scopus AI: Think bigger. Move faster. Act with confidence. https://www.elsevier.com/products/scopus/scopus-ai

Wang, L., Zhang, Z., Cao, Y., Tsung, F., & Luo, Y. (2026). TableTale: Reviving the narrative interplay between data tables and text in scientific papers. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.22908

Web of Science. (2026). Web of Science research assistant. https://clarivate.com/academia-government/scientific-and-academic-research/research-discovery-and-referencing/web-of-science/web-of-science-research-assistant/

Wei, H., Sun, Y., & Li, Y. (2025). DeepSeek-OCR: Contexts optical compression. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.18234

Westenberger, P., & Farmaki, D. (2025). Artificial intelligence for cultural heritage research: The challenges in UK copyright law and policy. Frontiers in European Journal of Cultural Management and Policy, 15, 14009. https://doi.org/10.3389/ejcmp.2025.14009

Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099

Zhu, L., Rahman, S. A., & Timan, H. (2026). Knowledge graph applications in cultural heritage: A ROSES-based systematic review. Information, 17(3), 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/info17030269

Downloads

Published

2026-09-05

How to Cite

Georgieva, E., Georgiev, T., & Stefanova, T. (2026). Enhancing Scientific Heritage Access Through AI-Powered Assistants and Collaboration Platforms in Academic Ecosystems. Digital Presentation and Preservation of Cultural and Scientific Heritage, 16, 195-210. https://doi.org/10.55630/dipp.2026.16.16